Grand Petition to Lift the Ban on Asylum Seekers Right to Work

The Lift the Ban Coalition is made up of 80 organisations, including charities, businesses and churches. They are calling on the government to give asylum seekers and adult dependents the right to work. They say:

‘People seeking asylum are given just £5.39 per day to meet their essential living costs. Almost half of all asylum seekers currently  wait over six months for their claim to be determined with many waiting years.  The Lift the Ban coalition is working to change this. Together, we believe we can #LiftTheBan and ensure that people seeking safety in the UK have the right to work.’

The coalition believes that asylum seekers could contribute £42m if work rules are relaxed.

For information about the Coalition and to sign the Petition click here:

‘Hostile Environment’: Home Office loses 75% of immigration rulings and 20-year wait for Home Office ruling cause untold misery and poverty

A Guardian report 17 August 2018 has revealed that all too often asylum seekers wait up to 20 years for a decision on their asylum claims. For much of that time, asylum seekers endure poverty and destitution. The report quotes Stephen Hale, chief executive Refugee Action: “Forcing people to wait more than 15 years for a decision on their asylum claim while banned from work and living below the poverty line is utterly barbaric”.

To read the report click here:

A further Guardian report 03 September 2018 reveals that the Home Office loses 75% of appeals against Home Office rulings. In the vast majority of cases, asylum seekers with meritorious claims, upheld by a judge, are unnecessarily challenged by the Home Office. Often, they will have waited in poverty for years for the initial tribunal ruling only to be condemned to further delay. The report cites Mr. Justice McClosky, the former president of the upper tribunal condemning the home secretary for launching an appeal, saying, “It was manifestly devoid of any substance or merit and should have been exposed accordingly.”

To read the report click here:

How Britain’s asylum system fails the most vulnerable

Not only is the recent small increase in the weekly asylum cash payment wholly inadequate, many asylum seekers wait for long periods of time for the minimal support they are entitled to. A Refugee Action Report, Slipping through the Cracks: How Britain’s Asylum System Fails the Most Vulnerable, analyses the delays and describes the effects on vulnerable asylum seekers. The report was based on research by Refugee Action and the Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit’s asylum support project, Asylum Support Housing Advice (ASHA).

Of the 315 cases supported by Refugee Action or Asylum Support Housing Advice (ASHA) reviewed:

  • 50% of applications for emergency support (section 98) were wrongly refused, with 92% of these decisions overturned when challenged;
  • People waited an average of 2 months to receive long term financial and accommodation support and 3 months to receive just financial support.
  • People were left in initial accommodation for an average of 37 days, almost double the Home Office’s maximum target of 19 days. This left many in squalid, unsuitable conditions.


To read the Report click here: Slipping Through the Cracks – A Refugee Action Report

Increase in Asylum Support Rate Condemned as ‘Paltry’

The Home Office response to a consultation on the cash support provided to asylum seekers has been to increase weekly payments from £36.95 to £37.75 per week: an increase of 80p per week, or just over 11p per day. This increase came into effect on the 5th February 2017. Cashless support for asylum seekers who have submitted a fresh claim remains at £35.39p: they receive no increase at all.

Refugee Action, whose response to the consultation recommended that asylum support rates should be at least 70% of mainstream benefits, expressed disappointment at the small increase, which has beencondemned as ‘paltry’ by the Refugee Council.

To see the Refugee Action press release click here:

To see the Refugee Council press release release click here:


Refugee Council Universal Credit Warning

The Refugee Council’s response to the DWP consultation, March 2017, on the roll out of Universal Credit warns that it will result in the increase of destitution and homelessness of refugees moving from asylum support.

They say that:

  • The government should urgently address the anomaly of the asylum support system and Universal Credit timescales to avoid routinely forcing new refugees into destitution and homelessness.
  • Flexibility must be built into the application procedure in order not to exclude those with no National Insurance Number and/or no bank account at the time of application.
  • A solution must be sought to the effect of limiting the Universal Credit Advance to those already assessed to be eligible, in order to avoid complete destitution.

To read the Refugee Council submission click  here Refugee_Council_Universal_Credit

All Party Parliamentary report warns that many newly recognised refugees face destitution and homelessness

April 2017

The All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees has produced a report titled ‘Refugees Welcome?’. The report identifies a two-tier  system of support, and warns that Government policy leaves many newly recognised refugees at risk of homelessness and destitution.

The report’s recommendations include:

  • a National Refugee Integration Strategy
  • a Minister for Refugees

To view the report click here: APPG_on_Refugees_-_Refugees_Welcome_report

Red Cross Reports Rising Number of Destitute Asylum Seekers in the UK

A report by the red Cross has reported a rising number of destitute asylum seekers in the UK. To read the report click here:

Almost 5,600 refugees and asylum seekers have been destitute in the UK in the first half of this year, according to British Red Cross.

Destitute refugees and asylum seekers by nationality

  1. Sudan: 642 (11%)
  2. Eritrea: 587 (10%)
  3. Iran: 580 (10%)
  4. Syria: 361 (6%)
  5. Iraq: 297 (5%)

With destitution rising among asylum seekers in Scotland how could the system work better?

Liam Kirkaldy writing in the award winning current affairs magazine ‘Holyrood’ asks what can be done about rising destitution among asylum seekers. To read his article click here:


Red Cross: Record Number of UK Destitute Asylum Seekers

The British Red Cross have said that a record number of asylum seekers in Britain are being left destitute, and planned legislation could plunge thousands more into poverty. The charity said it had supported more than 9,000 refugees and asylum seekers who were destitute last year, compared with 7,700 in 2014. The youngest was less than one year old and the oldest was 81.

The Red Cross said an Immigration Bill, being debated in the House of Lords was expected to reduce asylum support further. Some 29,000 people applied for asylum in Britain between September 2014 and October 2015, 19 percent up from the previous year. Nearly 44% of destitute asylum seekers supported by the Red Cross were from Eritrea, Sudan, Iran and Syria, which are among the biggest sources of refugees.

London (Thompsons Reuters Foundation) 12 January 2016

Magistrate resigns after paying asylum seekers court costs

Guardian newspaper articles have reported that the steep rises in court fees, introduced in April 2015, is having a devastating impact on poor people convicted of minor offences and who are unable to pay the new court fees. One report concerned a senior magistrate who resigned after being suspended for paying £40 pound from his own pocket to pay towards the court fees imposed on an asylum seeker whose only means of support was £35 per week top-up card to be used in specified shops. Another report cited the Lord Chief Justice’s criticism of the court fees and a judge in Truro who told a defendant as he imposed a £900 charge: “The charge has no bearing on your ability to pay. It is totally inappropriate for people of no means to have to pay this charge. It happens to be current government policy but as an independent judge I regard it as extremely unfair.”

View the reports here:

Magistrate resigns

Judicial criticism